If we ever held a contest to choose South Africa’s “foot-in-mouth sufferer of the year”, then Luke Watson would be unbeatable. The only time this genius seems to open his mouth is to change feet.
What can be said about this national disgrace that hasn’t already been said about diarrhoea?
The following was sent to me by the guys from AfriForum:
“The civil rights initiative AfriForum’s legal team will send a letter to the Springbok rugby player, Luke Watson, in which it is demanded of him to withdraw his statement that ‘the problem with SA rugby is that it is controlled by Dutchmen’, in writing within seven days and to apologise for it unconditionally.
“If Watson were to refuse to withdraw his statements, AfriForum intends to have him summoned to the Equality Court on charges of hate speech. Watson made his hurtful statements regarding Afrikaners when he appeared as guest speaker at the Umbumbo Rugby Festival at the University of Cape Town on 3 October 2008.
“A similar lawyer’s letter was sent by AfriForum this past Friday to the chairman of the parliamentary portfolio committee on sport, Butana Komphela, as well. In it, AfriForum also demands of Komphela to withdraw his recent statement that whites are ‘arrogant’ regarding the Springbok emblem in writing within seven days and to apologise for it unconditionally.
“According to Kallie Kriel, CEO of AfriForum, it is in no one in the country’s interest for Watson and Komphela to be allowed to continue making such polarising statement. ‘It is high time for them to be called to account in this regard and therefore AfriForum’s legal team will do everything in their power to ensure that Watson and Komphela have to try and defend their statements in court,’ Kriel added.
“Kriel pointed out that Watson and Komphela may be summoned to appear in the Equality Court in terms of Article 10 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (Act 4 of 2000). This article entails that ‘… no person may … communicate words based on … prohibited grounds (of which race and ethnic origin is one), against any person (including groups), that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate a clear intention to a) be hurtful; b) be harmful … ; c) promote or propagate hatred’. According to Kriel, AfriForum regards Komphela and Watson’s statements not only to be hurtful to whites and Afrikaners, but to be harmful as well.
“In terms of this Act, the Equality Court may order someone who contravenes the conditions of the act to apologise unconditionally and to pay damages in the shape of a donation to a suitable organisation. Kriel indicated that if Watson were to be found guilty, AfriForum would ask of him to donate money towards the promotion of civil rights.”
In the case of Komphela, I would suggest that he focus on the areas where he has real problems, such as Bafana Bafana and the Olympic debacle.
In the case of Luke Watson, I suggest he goes and lives elsewhere. The country has enough problems without geniuses like him looking for attention.
If truth be told, his inclusion in the Springbok team is down to political pressure rather than ability. The last coach was forced to put him in, and Pete should think long and hard before including this malcontent of limited ability in the squad, never mind the side.
The way he carries on you’d think he was essential to the Springboks.
In truth, we would welcome his permanent absence.
Author
A prince with dignity and determination
Prince Ngarambe’s goals are to become Rwanda’s first transgender model and to uplift the country’s youth
The EFF’s principles are unshakeable
Unlike the ANC, the core values of the freedom fighters do not change with each leader it elects
