Press "Enter" to skip to content

Why workers can survive on peanuts

By Roshila Jarosz

At around 12.20pm last Wednesday afternoon I was stunned. Actually, for a brief moment I thought my ears were deceiving me, then I realised there was no such luck. In part it was my fault — I was listening to student radio station Tuks FM (what’s an alternative rock girl to do?).

The DJ was talking about the recent strikes at Unisa. I’m forced to paraphrase as I highly doubt I’ll find a podcast to this piece of history, now regrettably engraved in my mind.

She described how workers were holding a banner that said, “We are not monkeys; don’t pay us peanuts”. Intrigued, I listened intently, surprised at the rarity of a student interested in current affairs. The next line revealed her arrière-pensée: in her opinion people could actually live on peanuts. Indeed, she wouldn’t mind because they are actually quite “nutritional”.

She’d thought long and hard about that one.

Her watertight argument went on to include an argument for strikes — because it can “change things”. But then again, now days every “Tom, Dick and Thandi” is striking instead of sitting down with their employers and chatting about it. There was also mention of bins being thrown around during strikes.

Personally, I thought that the least of her problems, unless it poses a threat of a rat infestation. Or baboons — who, being part of the primate clan, could very well steal the very peanuts on which she’s chosen to survive.

Does this lack of insight go to the very roots of society, and demonstrate a deeper malaise among some youth? They’ve inherited a democracy for which they didn’t fight. Most of the students I know are unaware of what people on the wrong side of the colour divide faced during apartheid. Disenchanted with the current dispensation, and ignorant of our past, they deeply resent “toyi-toying” workers.

Shouldn’t an educational institution take the responsibility for giving its students a broader perspective? I wonder if that DJ knew what those toyi-toying workers did during apartheid. Or what a dompas (passbook) was?

Ultimately, these are the leaders of tomorrow. Instead of creating a new monster that tramples on the rights of the poor, we could help young people move beyond political correctness. We could help them bridge the divide between rich and poor, black and white, and give them a fighting chance at a real unity.

In the words of Madiba, “I dream of the realisation of the unity of Africa, whereby its leaders combine in their efforts to solve the problems of this continent”. Education is key to the youth of today finding their way to this dream.

Roshila Jarosz worked as a journalist before selling out to corporate communications. In a moment of sanity/clarity, she realised she loved writing, and is now indulging in that passion once more.

Author

  • On our Reader Blog, we invite Thought Leader readers to submit one-off contributions to share their opinions on politics, news, sport, business, technology, the arts or any other field of interest. If you'd like to contribute, first read our guidelines for submitting material to this blog.

5 Comments

  1. Momma Cyndi Momma Cyndi 24 April 2013

    So the amount of destruction and vandalism during our average strike does not bother you nor the fact that they bring the whole country to its knees for 3 months of every year?

    Yes, she shouldn’t have been so flippant about it but she does have a point. Why do they strike every single year and destroy everything (and often everyone) in their path?

  2. Tofolux Tofolux 25 April 2013

    @Roshila, what this is, is nothing but maintaining the conditions to inflict prejudice against blacks in general and african in particular. We know that in the quest for self determination and self identity, blacks in general this will always be in conflict with those who have forced blacks into submission. This goes back to where our fathers, our brothers were forced to work in mines and live in hostels. This goes back to where our men were forced into seperation from society and this goes back to where men were robbed of the opportunity to be a brother, a father and normal individual surrounded by normality in a society. What they did there was to create a man who was empty, a shell, a person who was a shadow of his former self. The prejudice displayed by yourself, done quite glibly but very intentional relegates us once again into something which is subhuman. The peanuts and baboon remark is intentioned for a particular purpose.( We can read the script) You dont pose the question or defend the constitutional right for these workers to strike. In this glaring omission you fail to attack the absolute bias and the incorrectness of this bias that exists in the actions and words of some in our emerging new society. What you do is to perpetuate the notion that some cannot have any self determination and that some should always be in submission to something above them. This is wrong and quite hypocritical.

  3. The Creator The Creator 25 April 2013

    I don’t think you can simply blame the educational institutions. The whole political culture, and almost the whole social culture, is about getting as much as you can for yourself, and about denying all need for solidarity with others.

    Naturally the product is a bunch of clueless, selfish people.

  4. Enough Said Enough Said 25 April 2013

    Dear Roshila Jarosz

    Not sure if the first 3 commentators above actually read and understood what you wrote about, but thanks for your sincere comentary. Keep writing from your heart.

Leave a Reply