The internet is the new kaffeeklatsch, a digital clearinghouse of fact, hearsay, humour, folksy wisdom and calculated maliciousness, all in prodigious quantity. The viral email, in turn, is the whisper behind cupped hand of old – rippling with lightning speed through the global village.
And, just occasionally, an inspired idea does the rounds. One such is the suggestion that it is time for a ‘new Christmas tradition’ in South Africa.
This much-circulated email – I’ve received if three times – kicks off with a dig at ‘giant Asian factories kicking into high gear’ to supply ‘monstrous piles of cheaply-produced merchandise produced at the expense of our own labour force’. It then predictably goes on to argue that we buy South African and – less predictably and doubtlessly to the consternation of the chainstores – that we change our pattern of consumption.
It’s a message that might just find a receptive audience among a populace weary of conspicuous consumption or just plain platsak. Stop being, it implores, ‘one of those extravagant givers who think nothing of plunking down rands on a Chinese-made flat-screen’, rather gift ‘a few games at the local golf course, or a month at the gym’.
‘There are a gazillion owner-run restaurants and coffee shops. Ask if they have gift vouchers. Remember, this isn’t about big national chains, this is about supporting your hometown fellow South Africans with their financial lives on the line.’
The anonymous writer – clearly a small business owner – points out, accurately enough, that ‘when you buy a R50 string of lights, only about R5 stays in the community. Rather stock up on locally-produced candles or decorations and if you have … big bucks to burn, leave the trash guys or security guards a nice, big tip.’
The economics behind a plea to buy locally is beguiling. It is a fact that to provide benefit, money has to circulate and it best benefits a neighbourhood, a region, or a country if it remains in there, instead of being channelled to foreign creditors or offshore dividends.
However, that conveniently ignores the fact that cross-national shareholdings make it difficult to define a ‘local’ company. Now that Massmart is owned by Walmart, is it still a SA company? And what of ‘South African’ companies that have their primary listings on overseas bourses?
It also glosses over the conundrum of whether it is ultimately better for an economy that its consumers pay more for locally produced products or maximise individual earnings by paying less for imported products.
This is a conundrum that defeats even the vocally patriotic. The Congress of SA Trade Unions regularly yammers on at congresses about the need to ‘buy South African’. Regularly these selfsame delegates were exposed by the media to be wearing Chinese T-shirts and caps, produced abroad for Cosatu far more cheaply than SA’s beleaguered high-cost textile mills could hope to manage.
The politics around buying local is similarly complicated. Despite concerns in Britain over its manufacturing sector, the government won’t back a Buy British campaign because they believe it would be ‘counter-productive’. In global markets any official attempt to shape buying patterns to nationalistic ends has the danger of sparking retaliation from one’s trading partners.
Quibbles aside, the unknown emailer has it right. It is better to buy local than international; better to support the individual or small business than the conglomerate; and better to buy services than baubles.
That is especially true in a developing country like South Africa. Aside from worthwhile but struggling small and medium sized businesses, there are many crafters, artists and roadside entrepreneurs whose lives are financially fraught and would benefit enormously from the annual Christmas splurge. So, too, charities, environmental and wildlife organisations.
There’s a lot to be said for a ‘new tradition’ of building communities rather than corporate profits. Unfortunately, wealth correlates closely with selfishness, so such a shift is unlikely. There is also the stubborn snobbery that items manufactured overseas are superior to the local equivalent.
For the foreseeable future the corporates can probably sleep soundly. But it’s your choice.
Author
A prince with dignity and determination
Prince Ngarambe’s goals are to become Rwanda’s first transgender model and to uplift the country’s youth
The EFF’s principles are unshakeable
Unlike the ANC, the core values of the freedom fighters do not change with each leader it elects
