Reader Blog
Reader Blog

The unilateral road towards nation-building: Danger signs ahead

By Gugu Ndima

I was intrigued by a very innocent, captivating picture on the front page of two major publications. Two “born free” young South Africans who represent diversity in SA were nicely captured. The picture alone tells many tales; at first glance it’s perfect and void of sin or pretence. It’s a picture of hope for nation-building, and for anyone seeing the picture without reading the story, they could easily be deceived into thinking that we have perfectly managed to achieve diversity and finally have a non-racial society where black and white South Africans can now gather around a camp fire and sing Kumbaya. “Wow, South Africa has arrived,” I say to myself, until I read the story behind the crocodile grins of the two young ladies.

These two models were in a racist spat on a social network recently. They allegedly kissed and made up and the cynical Kodak moment, organised by the affirmative action representative of the DA, was captured on the front page of many newspapers. As expected of South Africans, we had a teary moment of artificial reconciliation and pretended that the evil step sister named “Racism” was dead and gone – again.

Are we gullible or we do have our heads so deep in the sand that it’s unbearable to even think of confronting racism in our society head-on? Every time we hear ranting reported, we again get angry and are reminded of the good old beast. This week, over and above the models and the Cape Tech student incidents, FW de Klerk took the overall standing ovation when he asserted on CNN that deep down, there are deeply entrenched beliefs that whites still reign supreme. His words were short of saying that the apartheid government actually did blacks a favour and made them vote (in their bush homelands where they belong, I guess).

This then made me wonder where this insurrectionist behaviour, especially on race, stems from with the “born free” generation. Where do the likes of Ken Sinclair and Jessica Leandra derive their resentment and condescending attitude for fellow black South Africans? Not so long ago we were tackling the Reitz Four case as a nation. The truth is that this is the exact teachings disseminated at their homes over dinner, in churches, and in their social gatherings when there is no black ear to listen except for, possibly, the domestic worker.

The FW de Klerks of this world can never see blacks as equal fellow human species. The generation after them and their grandchildren can only pass on this institutionalised thinking to their future descendants. Supremacy runs in their veins, religion and way of life. The mere fact that Jessica was audacious enough to post such a criminal statement without thinking simply means that this word is right at the tip of her tongue, used daily, for which she has never been reprimanded for until recently. Hence her shock at the public’s reaction – simply because in her community and immediate social network this is a way of life. This is how they view blacks. The question is, what are their parents teaching them?

In South Africa, 18 years post democracy, we have a place called Orania that epitomises racial segregation and sustains separatism (within a democratic country) in this day in age. These spontaneous slurs are a deeper reflection of the rage and re-emergence of racial tensions. We can’t hide from it any longer; we can’t glosscoat it through TV adverts and politically correct tip-toeing. We now have a younger generation, supposedly “born-free”, who have been severely contaminated and will not be kept silent. Tshidi Thamana is most probably not even politically active, but for that moment, she made sense of some slogans of the late comrade Peter Mokaba from the apartheid years, because she actually had a taste of racial intolerance and blatant attacks on her being by a white counterpart. I doubt she said this because she is racist, but she responded to the arrogant tone and statement made by Jessica Leandra demeaning a black man publicly and showing no remorse. It’s highly simplistic to say that she was racist – she is no different from blacks in the 70s responding to the draconian rule of the apartheid regime which belittled and undermined blacks.

We can do all sorts of reconciliation/PR exercises to cover up isolated slurs, but this does not address the undercurrent beneath the calm surface. If a cabinet minister can call his black colleagues Bantus or use that word as a reference in this day in age, what does he teach his children?

As a nation we haven’t achieved racial harmony. It has been mere tolerance, imposed to a large extent by the law. It has not been voluntary and as a nation we have bought into fragile non-racialism through Vanity Fair-like “nation building” events such as the rugby and soccer world cups. The road has been a unilateral one where, consistently, its blacks who accept apologies, blacks who are victims of racially motivated crimes, black workers who are exploited in companies. It’s consistently been the black hand that must hold out the white flag to keep the nation-building torch alive. Hence these slurs – both parties are not coming to the table equally.

If it wasn’t for affirmative action, black economic empowerment, employment equity, and generally the Constitution, many whites would have been happy with keeping the apartheid status quo, even though some don’t expressly say it. Most complaints about government come from the white section of society. Honestly speaking, the democratic government is worse compared to what previous government or regime in South Africa? The apartheid government? This is the only government in SA that has initiated inclusivity of all races, that has championed non-racialism despite conceited efforts to undermine it. Non-racialism will perpetually be a vision if we fail to address societal factors which still assert racial stereotypes such as “white supremacy”. Blacks in their majority are still poor and marginalised in the mainstream economy. Racial spatial disintegration still exists due to historical socio-economic imbalances – and one can still distinguish between a township and a suburb.

The judiciary, unfortunately to a very large extent, still plays (wittingly or unwittingly) an instrumental role in maintaining the apartheid status quo. Organisations such as AfriForum have never been apologetic about their views and what they stand for (i.e. to preserve historical memorabilia which has no place in the current dispensation). They managed to singlehandedly wipe out a significant piece of history – the Dubulíbhunu song – through the courts. They continue to use the courts to undermine transformation as their power base is still largely economical, and many economically powerful beings share their views in silent corners. So since access to the justice system still largely depends on one’s economic base, it is accessible by a few to maintain and preserve traces of our dark past.

The likes of Tshidi, Ken and Jessica are the new generation of racists who have access to social networks and can take the fight to uncontained places. One wonders how many other “born-frees” who have inherited such abhorrence for their fellow South African citizens exist. We should be apprehensive rather than passive; this should be a lesson for all South Africans that racism is a stark reality, and our failure to deal with it will only create an unnecessary burden for future generations.

Gugu Ndima is the media and communications officer of the ANC caucus in the Gauteng legislature. She writes in her personal capacity.

Tags: , , , , ,

  • The Place of Sara Baartman at UCT
  • It is time
  • Pauw’s revelations and democracy
  • The truth about Nkandla
    • Sterling Ferguson

      @The problem face SA is not racism but wide spread graft and corruption. The failure of blacks in SA just like in other parts of Africa to create an entrepreneur class of people to move this country forward. The ANC run government in SA have setup an economy of extraction to live off and the manufacturing sector has been neglected. The food production is on a decline and the population of SA is growing larger every year. The blacks in SA just like in other parts of Africa are not investing their money in Africa but, taking it over seas. The white make up a small percentage of the population so, the blacks should be focusing on developing instead of what whites think of them.

      Moreover, the Africans are always talking about colonialism keeping them backward which is a myth. The Asians countries with no resources were ruled by the colonial powers and look at their economies. When the president of Angola was asked why the people in Angola were so poor, he told him because of colonialism. However, he fails to tell this reporter that his daughter was one of the richest people in the world. I hate to say it but, your article is focusing on the wrong thing in SA.

    • Dave Harris

      Yes, these “born frees” are the canaries in the coal mine where the the dangerous gas of racism (Jessica Leandra) and anger (Tshidi Thamana) that continues to be passed down from generation to generation. Centuries of racism cannot magically disappear without proactive steps involving education, therapy and possibly some form of spirituality to overcome the cancer of racism.

      Our judiciary is stacked with apartheid-era judges who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, as seen by the recent rash of bizarre rulings. Afri(kaner)form now have the gall to proclaim Afrikaans, a bastardized European language, an “African” language, in order to suppress the number of black (Africans, Coloureds and Indians) students in certain schools and universities e.g. Univ of Stellenbosch still 77% white! Even the DA are shameless and brazen enough to take City of Durban to court for changing street names! Whatever next?

    • Nokuthula Nene

      Eish thankd Gugs for such profound truths .. Unfortunately 1994 carried hope that after that year South Africans will bridge the racial divides n live happily ever after. The reality is that racism is alive even now .Lastweek having a general conversation with fellow White south africans I learned that they regard condoms to be a blackman thing. My big question is how do we heal our past n embrace the futuire ,Who shld take the lead Thanks for a thought provoking articles Racism is a deamon n threat to the nations future

    • rmr

      Dear Ms Ndima, Your piece saddens me. It saddens me that you have the perception that nation building is a unilateral process because as a white Afrikaner I know many people who cannot be anything but South African and are in their own way involved in trying to build a new future. Many of us are, for example, sending children of colour to the same schools as our own children. My first such “child” has just graduated with a BCCom from Tuks. This is because we want an equal future, not because we are yearning for baasskap. Many of us are revolted by that idea. I have Afrikaans friends who raise their daughter to address all adults (regardless of colour) as “tannie”. They consider it important that she learns Zulu. In a recent inverview on Kyknet the chairman of the Transvaal Landbou Unie, Andre Botha, in explaining the decision of South African farmers to trek to the Congo in a farming venture, emphasised that he was a patriot (to this South Africa of today); that he was proud to serve “his president” (ie President Zuma) and how much he liked the people of the Congo. He was proud of the contribution the little band of South Africans could make to food production in the Congo. I had no sense there of baasskap, but of a grateful participation in Africa. Having said all this, I am saddened because I can understand why you feel as you do. I just wanted to tell you that you are not alone on the road.

    • Benzo

      Dear Gugu…”The mere fact that Jessica was audacious enough to post such a criminal statement without thinking simply means that this word is right at the tip of her tongue, used daily, for which she has never been reprimanded for until recently. Hence her shock at the public’s reaction – simply because in her community and immediate social network this is a way of life. This is how they view blacks. The question is, what are their parents teaching them?”

      What are your parents teaching you??? Interesting article, overflowing of generalisations and prejudices. Difficult to respond without being seen as patronising or called a racist.

      Just keep in mind that “social re-engineering” takes roughly 3 generations. Maybe a little patience with a positive attitude will help. Wishing you luck.

    • Jack Sparrow

      Since when did “thought leader” become a mouthpiece for the anc’s racist propaganda? Is it the Citizen of the Nats time? Gugu cannot / will not / is not allowed to see that all racism is wrong in principal. To pick out a tiny number of incidents with a bit of exageration, and try to expand them to cover a segment of the population based on skin colour is not only stupid; it’s wrong. But, as it was Nat policy to focus on skin colur issues, so it is the anc’s policy. With the same goal. To hide the looting.

    • The Creator

      Good article, in my judgement.

    • Bernard K Hellberg

      Jessica = racism; Tshidi = anger?

      How about:

      Jessica = anger; Tshidi = racism?

      Just asking – on behalf of the hundreds of farmers and their families, as well as the 2-year-old Potgieter child slaughtered in cold blood, raped, assault, etc by people who were “angry.”