Athambile Masola
Athambile Masola

The problem with ‘buying, swapping and selling’ domestic workers

I recently came across an advert about a domestic worker. The advert was a Facebook post written on a group called “Westville buy, swap and sell”. The group is used by a variety of people wanting to get rid of household appliances. I became uncomfortable when a black woman was made part of the list of “things” one can buy, swap and sell. This is not the first time I’ve seen an advert of this nature. The first time was a poster on a notice board outside the flat where I lived. It was something along the lines of “Do you need a half-day maid? R100/day”. On a separate occasion I’ve noticed emails asking people if they need a “char” and elaborating on the domestic work done by a black woman with an English name. I’m sympathetic to the fact that domestic work is an option for many working-class women and it often seems that their employers help them by advertising on their behalf so they can find more work.

But why do these ads make me uncomfortable?

One of the things pointed out in the Westville buy, swap and sell advert was that the woman, whose services were being advertised, became an object like a household appliance. I was left wondering whether the domestic worker had been part of crafting the advert with her employer. I also wondered if she was happy with how she was represented. Among other things the ad mentioned that “we have never locked valuables away and nothing has ever gone missing”. The ad also mentioned that she is great with animals and would make a great carer for the elderly.



At face value there’s nothing wrong with this gesture. In fact the responses on the group indicate that this is normal and even kind on the employer’s part. The problems with such advertising however are layered — race, class and gender. The black woman is being advertised as a commodity owned by a white man who no longer needs her services. Such practices have a history where black woman’s bodies were advertised for slavery many centuries ago. It is also significant to point out the power relations between working-class people who need employment and middle-class people who can employ someone for more than 20 years and discard her when they no longer need her.

The advert made me think of the film The Help and the poem My Name by Magoleng wa Selepe. The Help is a movie about domestic workers in the American south during the Jim Crow laws. The film would have us believe that in spite of the political system, black women were happy to be employed and looked after their employers even if they treated them badly because they were still part of the family. I have heard this many times from white people: “Mary has been with us since I was born. She’s a part in of the family now’.”

The glaring problem with such sentiments is that Mary is not part of the family because white families don’t treat each other the way they treat Mary. The poem My Name looks at the very idea of black workers whose names are changed in order for them to secure employment. In the black community a similar thing may happen where the domestic worker is not addressed by her name: she might be referred to as “Sisi” or “Auntie” or her clan name is used. The point is their identity often changes when they become a domestic worker because their status is that of a worker and that’s all that matters.

The obvious problem with the advert I saw on Facebook is that it is potentially racist and that the racism is not overt. Is it ethical for people to advertise their domestic worker on social media or send emails on their behalf when they no longer need their service? If the advert isn’t racist then it’s possibly an example of the fraught nature of the role of the domestic worker. It also highlights the position of black working-class women who are dispensable and vulnerable in a system that sees them as the help and balancing their humanity at the same time.

Would it be better if I saw an advert for domestic workers on a website created by black women advertising themselves the way middle-class people have recruitment websites? I’m not sure but I would probably not be as uncomfortable. The agency of a black woman in the position of “the help” is compromised when she is advertised on a website that also advertises chairs and random household appliances. The advert also calls into question privilege and the things people say and do when they think black people are not there to see, hear or judge what they say about black people. The email and the poster I mention are an example of both white and class privilege: if someone in a privileged position wants something (or no longer needs domestic help in the case of this domestic worker on Facebook) they can explore certain avenues to get what they want.

Domestic workers are still a strong part of a culture reliant on class dynamics. Given our economic climate and bad education system many people would argue that being a cleaner or a gardener is better than nothing if someone doesn’t have the skills for other employment. This is probably true but we must consider the implications of these power relations whether we like it or not.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • Inequality and violent protests in South Africa
  • Marx at 200: As relevant as ever
  • The Place of Sara Baartman at UCT
  • The decline of the American Empire
    • Laura Taylor Peddle

      Good article, thanks.

    • RSA.MommaCyndi

      I don’t know how I feel about this article. Having been retrenched a few times, during difficult economic times, I don’t think I would have minded being advertised on the toilet wall (well that is extreme, but it isn’t easy wondering into the financial unknown when you are financially unstable).

      It is fully understandable how the historic memory of slavery makes black women feel uncomfortable about being ‘marketed’. It does become difficult though. How on earth do I reply to someone asking me to help them find work if I am not allowed to phone family and friends and ask if they need someone?

    • ikick

      How do you know that this, or any other ad, has been posted in a ” white owner, black servant” relationship?

    • Ta Gino

      i don’t fault you for seeing nothing wrong with that advert, it is, as you seem to see to, a white person passing on “an Anna” to others…….

    • Ta Gino

      the Facebook profile of the person suggests that he is a white male.

    • RSA.MommaCyndi

      I hate to break it to you, but that is what a job is. An accountant is employed because they are good at accounts, not because they are a nice person with a granny who has a knee complaint and a daughter who is good at ballet. You are selling a product (yourself) and nobody cares what colour you are or how ‘nice’ you are. It has nothing to do with white privilege or black ego or anything else. It is not a cocktail party, it is a job.

    • Arroia

      You’re right, the employer should’ve just let her fend for herself. *insert sarcasm font*

    • SmilingElephant

      There are employers of domestic workers in this country who:
      1) Pay terrible low wages.
      2) Pay above average wages
      3) Would never dream of using such a “buying and swapping” forum.
      4) Have no inhibitions using a “buy and swap” forum.
      5) Treat their domestic workers as part of the family.
      6) Treat their domestic workers with respect, but not as part of the family.
      7) Have no respect for their domestic workers.
      I can go on…
      Your assertion that “Would it be better if I saw an advert for domestic workers on a website created by black women advertising themselves the way middle-class people have recruitment websites? I’m not sure but I would probably not be as uncomfortable. ..”
      Employers of domestic workers are male, female, black, white, Indian, coloured and in-between and you will find all of the above mentioned good and bad characteristics in these employers. If you feel that black women are somehow holier than the rest, then go out and prove this in an actual scientific study. Until then, you’re entitled to your opinion, but perhaps you’re in for a bit of a shock one of these days…

    • Sam Dixon

      Twenty million unemployed people in this country and you’re not happy that one of the searches for a job took place on a buy & sell facebook page? How many other places did this job search take place?

      Do me a favour, you are so out of line here trying to turn this into a racist act.

      You made no reference in your article as to whether or not you contacted the person in question to see how she feels, nor to ascertain whether or not she found another job. If you did you’d run the risk of not having an article to write that reinforces your racist anti-white philosophy.

      Your’e just another one of those people whose ego gets in the way of black lives.

    • Sam Dixon

      This has really been bugging me and I have to ask the author if she has ever been without a job, with the bills piling up, kids to feed and the Sheriff knocking at your door?
      I really don’t think so.

    • johnbpatson

      In the old days, the most powerful marketing tool a domestic worker in South Africa could have was a reference — a signed and dated letter, with contact details giving the employer’s opinion of the worker.
      Some employers, after brushes with government departments, are now reluctant to give references in this form. (I know at least one case where Department of Labour officials turned up on the door-step threatening all sorts of criminal proceedings based on a flattering reference provided, proof of exploitation they said, and had to be bribed to go away).
      This electronic announcement may be the first of a new electronic form of reference, which will be a good thing for individual workers. After all, it is the idea behind Linked-in.

    • alice42

      Good point! Your comment highlights the condescension so common in these types of stories. The writer assumes that the domestic worker cannot possibly understand what is happening to her and that it is the white person pulling all the strings. That is very insulting to the intelligence of the domestic worker and the reading public.